The leap from modernism to post-modernism does not only imply a change
of ideals but also a change of power, the change of a government and how it
affects the people under its control. Throughout France’s history there have
been many changes, one of the most important ones has been the French
revolution of the 18th century. In this essay I will focus on the
most important characteristics of both the Weimar’s republic and the French
revolution, and later on I’ll highlight some connections between both of these
events.
The Weimar’s republic was a parliamentary democracy established as a
consequence of the treaty of Versailles which was signed at the end of World
War I as a result of the defeat of the German Empire. This sudden happening did
not turn out so well for the modernist Germany, as the conditions to which the
country was subjected were rather unfair. The republic’s citizens and political
leaders had to hassle in order to keep the fragile government system running.
The economic system suffered of hyperinflation which devaluated the mark to an
obscene value. The rising popularity of
the Nationalist Socialist party and the public opinion which blamed the past
regime for the countries problems ended up dissolving the new republic and
leading the way towards the Third Reich.
The French revolution was a period of extreme change within France which
occurred from 1789 to 1799. The revolution started due to large amounts of
debts which had been originated from ludicrous expenses made by the aristocrats
and their tax avoidance. The conditions in which most of the peasants lived in
France were inhuman and the politic stability had started to fade just after
the family bonds with other kingdoms began to weaken. With a fragile monarchy and angry peasants
the stage was set for a revolution.
After overthrowing the King, there were several changes in order to
convert France into parliamentary democracy.
Having analyzed both of these cases, you can notice that the
parliamentary republics which were established as direct consequence of any
type of armed conflict don’t have solid foundations and therefore their
governments are most likely to perish.
The foundations of a solid governmental system consist not only in
having a solid economy, but also possessing a certain amount of support from
the people.
No comments:
Post a Comment