Monday, June 11, 2012

Blog 5: Transitions in power


The Weimar Republic, also known as Weimar Germany, is a period of time between First World War and the rice of the Nazi power in the late 1930’s. As opposed to the thinking of the epoch it is now proven that this republic created a transition of power in the defeated Germany, but also in regions nearby and, more importantly, it defined a new era in the rising of the nationalism ideology. I consider this to be a huge step on the history of nations because no one had dared of a regime based on the patriotic feeling and autocratic government, let alone put it in practice and this was the turning point for countries to start considering a switch in power. I will focus on Hungary during the interwar period (1919-1940).
                As every country’s history, Hungary started by being and empire, the Austro-Hungarian Empire. However, as the Great War ended the empire dissolved and the country was forced, for the first time ever, to create a successful form of government in which society and authority could work as one. Instead, there was civil war, resulting in the rule of Mihály Károlyi as president of the first republic of Hungary. Thanks to his reforms, population became discontent and Communists, leaded by Béla Kun proclaimed Hungary a Soviet Republic. His regime did not last long and, after much discrepancy between the population, Hungary turned into a Nazi-influenced Parliamentary Democracy which leaned more to autocratic rule. Nevertheless, it wasn’t until that evolution from first republic to communism –1918 to 1919 –when the power change was actually seen and sensed by the population of Hungary.
                I think that power is actually visible in the way one can control the population of a country and use it to fulfill one’s objectives. This was the case of Mihály Károlyi, who truly believed in the Entente philosophy and, to redeem the people from the guilt and destruction occurred in World War I, disarmed the national army and left the country defenseless. Obviously, Czechoslovakia, Rumania and other territories nearby invaded and stole Hungarian territory. Maybe the President’s intention was not to have his territory pilfered, but it was his ultimate powerful decision that sealed the fate of one third of Hungarians.
                On the other hand, Béla Kun gained the support of the Social Democrats and his popularity rose to the level that he ascended to power quickly. However, and in spite of the battles won again Czechoslovakia, his unpopular decisions of nationalizing the industry won him the discontent of the population and eventually he was out ruled for his bad use of the military power that he had restored after his predecessor.  
                Having analyzed this main swift in power, I think that it is a delicate matter to choose the right government for a country, no matter its size or population type. In addition, the post-war period was extremely difficult, for it presented the path to modern times and a new way of thinking –and therefore ruling –was needed. As we found in the first case, trying to install the ideas of a certain current –which had started far from Hungary –was a catastrophe, for it ended up in the loss of territory. A regime, in which the battles won meant nothing when accompanied by ruthless military forces use and lame decisions, was clearly not the solution, either. I think that there is a need to consider the cultural and economic aspects of the country and try to establish a balance in the power one person has. 

References:
"History of Hungary: History." History of Hungary: History. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 June 2012. <http://hungarianhistory.tripod.com/>.

No comments:

Post a Comment